Only 37% of surveyed individuals selected taste preferences as the most important factor they consider when shopping for groceries online. This sharply contrasts with long-reported food purchasing values, where taste typically ranks first when shopping in person, according to the February Consumer Food Insights Report (CFI).
The survey-based report from Purdue University’s Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability (CFDAS) assesses food spending, consumer satisfaction and values, support of agricultural and food policies, and trust in information sources. Purdue experts conducted and evaluated the survey, which included 1,200 consumers across the US.
The February report breaks down long-running CFI data by retirees and non-retirees. In addition, new questions describe consumers’ preferences for online grocery shopping.
“Asked which factors consumers consider important when shopping for groceries, nutritional targets and health goals were selected by 59% and 57%, respectively,” said the report’s lead author, Joseph Balagtas, professor of agricultural economics at Purdue and director of CFDAS.
When asked about their priorities for personalized online shopping, 26% indicated that they most valued personalization related to budgets and prices. And when it comes to retailers’ use of consumer data to customize the online shopping experience, 51% were willing to share existing personal data such as past purchases and browsing history, compared to 28% who were unwilling to share that data.
“The attributes that consumers value most when shopping remain one of the most stable measures we track in the CFI,” Balagtas said. “Taste, affordability and nutrition — in that order — are the most important to American consumers. Social responsibility and the environmental impact of our food system are less important to consumers.”
Last month’s survey revealed distinct patterns in consumer trust across food-related information sources according to retirement status, noted Caitlinn Hubbell, a market research analyst at CFDAS and a report co-author. Retirees (31.5%) place more trust in the US Department of Agriculture than non-retirees (18.2%). Similarly, more retirees trust the American Medical Association (49.5%) than the nonretired (29%).
Smaller differences emerged between retirees and non-retirees in the consumer behaviors category. Non-retirees were slightly more likely to buy local over nonlocal foods. Further, non-retirees reported that they sometimes choose organic over nonorganic foods, while retirees indicated that they rarely do.
As for consumer beliefs, more than two-thirds of both groups (66%) agree that local food is better for the environment than nonlocal food. “National food insecurity stood at 13% in February, representing a 2% decline from January,” Hubbell said. More retirees were food insecure (14%) than non-retirees (10%), but the self-assessed diet quality for both groups was about the same. “Retired and nonretired individuals fall well below the healthy diet threshold,” she said.
Consumer food spending remained stable from January, with households reporting an average of $128 weekly on groceries and $73 weekly on dining out in February. “Consumer estimates of food inflation remain higher than official consumer price index figures, suggesting a persistent perception gap,” Hubbell noted. “The Consumer Price Index for food inflation was down 0.2% from the previous month.”
The Center for Food Demand Analysis and Sustainability is part of Purdue’s Next Moves in Plant Sciences 2.0 and uses innovative data analysis shared through user-friendly platforms to improve the food system. In addition to the Consumer Food Insights Report, the center offers a portfolio of online dashboards.